Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael ODonnell's avatar

Quote: “he was not permitted to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, the tree of judgment that signified his entrance into mature kingly wisdom and authority.”

Observation: I’ve read Jim Jordan’s Merit versus Maturity several months ago, and I found myself torn between two views. Mr. Jordan argues that Adam would have eventually been given the fruit of the tree in order to do war with the devil spirit as dominion increased on the wild earth. But, there would come a time when Adam (mankind) could do no more, and Jesus would come and finish the battle once and for all. (In a nutshell)

But, doesn’t it make more sense to say that Adam’s (mankind’s) prohibition to not eat of this tree is because it was never meant for mankind (feminine) to eat without Jesus coming first?

Jesus IS the King (the Tree we had to wait for) and all of mankind is like a “vassal” in Covenant with Him, and THAT stipulation is to “taste not, touch not” until the proper “day”.

By waiting, (and obeying God’s Word), mankind would mature for Love, and Jesus would come, kill the enemy, and THEN give His Bride (Adamic humanity) the fruit of rulership alongside of Him on the throne. But only AFTER Jesus incarnated. The other view creates dissonance to me.

Just some thoughts… I may be wrong here.

Michael ODonnell's avatar

Also, if immature evil has produced all of the wars, murder, violence, rape, adultery, treason, etc… what will mature evil produce in the end??

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?